AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on February 13, 2008, doi:10.1177/0363546507313090

(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2008;36:921.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/5/921    most recent
0363546507313090v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liem, D.
Right arrow Articles by Poetzl, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liem, D.
Right arrow Articles by Poetzl, W.

Article

The Influence of Arthroscopic Subscapularis Tendon and Capsule Release on Internal Rotation Strength in Treatment of Frozen Shoulder

Dennis Liem, MD1*, Felix Meier, MD1, Lothar Thorwesten, PhD2, Bjoern Marquardt, MD1, Joern Steinbeck, MD3, Wolfgang Poetzl, MD4

1 Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
2 Department of Sports Medicine, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
3 {sect}Orthopaedic Practice Clinic, Muenster, Germany
4 Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vulpiusklinik, Bad Rappenau, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dennisliem{at}web.de.


   Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic release of the capsule is a popular treatment option for chronic refractory frozen shoulder. Additional release of the intra-articular part of the subscapularis is controversial regarding possible impairment of subscapularis function.

Hypothesis: Arthroscopic release of the intra-articular part of the subscapularis produces good clinical results and does not lead to reduced internal rotation strength.

Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: Twenty-two patients were retrospectively evaluated 53 months (range, 12-106) after undergoing arthroscopic anterior capsular release, including release of the intra-articular portion of the subscapularis. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and the Constant score. Isometric and isokinetic strength for internal and external rotation were determined at the time of follow-up in both shoulders using a Cybex dynamometer.

Results: The Constant score was improved significantly from 17.7 points to 82.8 points (P< .0001) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score increased significantly from 23.5 points to 76.8 points (P< .0001). The mean range of motion was significantly improved for external rotation from 16° to 58°, from 66° to 142° for abduction, and from 76° to 155° for forward flexion. Isometric and isokinetic strength in the standard abduction position of the Cybex dynamometer showed no significant side-to-side difference.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic capsular release combined with a release of the intra-articular portion of the subscapularis tendon revealed good clinical results in the arthroscopic treatment of adhesive capsulitis without significant loss of internal rotation strength.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.