HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 35/6/955    most recent 0363546506298585v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wellmann, M. Articles by Petersen, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wellmann, M. Articles by Petersen, W. Related Collections Animal studies Biomechanics Dislocations

Biomechanical Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Repairs for Complete Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

From the Department of Traumatology, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany

^* Address correspondence to Mathias Wellmann, MD, Department of Traumatology, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Waldeyerstr. 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany (e-mail: Mathias.Wellmann{at}ukmuenster.de).

Background: The conventional coracoclavicular ligament augmentation with a single polydioxanone loop has been shown to have some pivotal disadvantages.

Hypothesis: A minimally invasive flip button/polydioxanone repair provides similar biomechanical properties to the conventional polydioxanone cerclage around the coracoid. However, the authors expected a difference in linear stiffness, ultimate load, and permanent elongation between suture anchor repairs and polydioxanone repairs.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: The tensile fixation strength of 4 different minimally invasive repairs was tested in a porcine metatarsal model: (1) 1.3-mm single polydioxanone cerclage with a subcoracoidal flip button fixation, (2) 1.3-mm single polydioxanone cerclage, (3) Twinfix Ti 3.5-mm/Ultrabraid 2-suture anchor, and (4) Twinfix Ti 5.0-mm/Ultrabraid 2-suture anchor. The testing protocol included cyclic superoinferior loading and a subsequent load to failure trial.

Results: The flip button repair (646 N) and the conventional polydioxanone banding (663 N) revealed significant higher ultimate loads than did the suture anchor repairs (295 and 331 N, respectively; P < .001), whereas no significant differences were found for the elongation behavior under cyclic loading.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the 2 polydioxanone repairs. The ultimate load of the flip button procedure reaches the level of the native coracoclavicular ligament complex as it has been quantified in the literature.

Clinical Relevance: Although the biomechanical results comparing a minimally invasive flip button procedure versus a conventional polydioxanone cerclage are similar, the authors recommend the flip button procedure because of its minimally invasive approach and the secure subcoracoidal fixation technique with a minimized risk of anterior loop dislocation and neurovascular damage.

Key Words: acromioclavicular separation • coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction • suture anchor • polydioxanone (PDS) augmentation • flip button

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Fraser-Moodie, N. L. Shortt, and C. M. Robinson Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint J Bone Joint Surg Br, June 1, 2008; 90-B(6): 697 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]