HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Oakes, D. A. Articles by McAllister, D. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Oakes, D. A. Articles by McAllister, D. R. Related Collections Knee Biomechanics

The Effect of Femoral Tunnel Position on Graft Forces During Inlay Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction*

Daniel A. Oakes, MD, Keith L. Markolf, PhD, Justin McWilliams, Charles R. Young and David R. McAllister, MD^,

Biomechanics Research Section, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

* Presented at the 27th annual meeting of the AOSSM, Keystone, Colorado, June 2001, and the 48th annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Dallas, Texas, 2002.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to David R. McAllister, MD, UCLA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Health Sciences, Box 956902, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6902

Background: The femoral tunnel may be positioned centrally or eccentrically within the posterior cruciate ligament footprint during a single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Hypothesis: After reconstruction, graft forces are significantly different from those of the native posterior cruciate ligament and are affected by the position of the femoral tunnel.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: The resultant force in the native posterior cruciate ligament was measured in nine cadaveric knees as the knee was flexed from –5° to 120° of flexion. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed with the femoral side of the graft positioned centrally and then offset 5 mm eccentric to the central position.

Results: Mean graft forces were not significantly different between eccentric and central tunnel positions during passive knee extension between 120° and 0° of flexion; at 5° of hyperextension, the eccentric position generated significantly lower graft forces. For both reconstruction techniques, mean graft forces were significantly higher than those for the native posterior cruciate ligament beyond approximately 90° of flexion, for 5 N·m internal and external tibial torque; 5 N·m varus and valgus moment.

Conclusions: Graft force reductions achieved with the eccentric femoral position appear to be relatively small compared with the forces expected during rehabilitation and activities of daily living.

Clinical Relevance: After posterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction, rehabilitation activities that load the knee at high degrees of flexion should be avoided to limit excessive forces on the maturing graft.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. L. Markolf, B. T. Feeley, S. R. Jackson, and D. R. McAllister Where Should the Femoral Tunnel of a Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Be Placed to Best Restore Anteroposterior Laxity and Ligament Forces? Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 604 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]