AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on May 9, 2008, doi:10.1177/0363546508317412

(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2008;36:1094.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/6/1094    most recent
0363546508317412v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mae, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fujie, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mae, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fujie, H.

Article

Optimization of Graft Fixation at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part II: Effect of Knee Flexion Angle

Tatsuo Mae, MD, PhD1*, Konsei Shino, MD, PhD2, Ken Nakata, MD, PhD3, Yukiyoshi Toritsuka, MD, PhD1, Hidenori Otsubo, MD3, Hiromichi Fujie, PhD4

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
2 Faculty of Comprehensive Rehabilitation, Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, Japan
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Medical School, Osaka, Japan
4 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kogakuin University, Tokyo, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ta-mae{at}umin.ac.jp.


   Abstract

Background: There is no consensus about flexion angle of the knee at the time of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of flexion angle at the final graft fixation on the positional relationship as well as the load between femur and tibia.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Six intact cadaveric knees were passively flexed and extended under 6 degrees of freedom with the robotic system developed in our laboratory, while their 3-dimensional paths were recorded. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed with a single-socket technique using autogenous quadrupled hamstring tendons, while the graft was fixed at 0° (group A), 20° (group B), or 90° (group C) with a constant initial tension of 44 N. The knees then repeated the same movement as before while the relative position between femur and tibia was recorded. The load in the femorotibial joint was also calculated based on the principle of superposition.

Results: Posterior displacement of the tibia compared with the normal knee was the smallest in group B at all flexion angles, while the load between tibia and femur in group B was also the smallest and the closest to the normal knee.

Conclusion: As the positional relationship as well as the load between femur and tibia in group B was the closest to that in the normal knee, 20° of flexion is the most desirable of the positions tested for graft tensioning and fixation at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Clinical Relevance: The tibia-femur position is well retained when the graft was fixed at 20° of flexion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.